I like the proposed "application console window" approach. This way we
could get rid of the real console in Windows (unless we still need to
handle crashes in a different manner).
Regards,
Olivier
----- Original Message -----
From: "Evan Pierce" <net17045@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'Ethereal development'" <ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, February 29, 2004 10:04 PM
Subject: RE: [Ethereal-dev] Capture dialog ringbuffer behaviour
| Most decent users (people capable of understanding and reading a
network
| capture). However I would make an argument against using the
eventviewer as
| I am sure this would add overhead to the development/porting between
| unix-like and windows operating systems. I feel personally that a
logfile
| which will work well within both environment types would be less
hassle.
| Possibly a dialog box with "View Error Log" under one of the menu's
(maybe
| help?!) will make it even easier for people not comfortable with
digging
| into folders?
|
|
| Evan
|
| -----Original Message-----
| From: ethereal-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| [mailto:ethereal-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Guy Harris
| Sent: Sunday, February 29, 2004 10:16 PM
| To: Ethereal development
| Subject: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Capture dialog ringbuffer behaviour
|
|
| On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 01:09:33PM -0700, John McDermott wrote:
| > > Maybe we need some sort of error log instead of the console
output (at
| > > least on win32).
| >
| > Or a log to the application part of Event Viewer?
|
| How many users know that the Event Viewer even exists?
|
| _______________________________________________
| Ethereal-dev mailing list
| Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
|
| _______________________________________________
| Ethereal-dev mailing list
| Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
|