[Ulf Lamping <ulf.lamping@xxxxxx>]

Hmmm, just checked in renaming this :-(

Ian Schorr wrote:

> I'd strongly disagree with IO stat being renamed "Throughput" since "throughput" is only one of quite a few statistics that can be extracted from it.
>
>  
Could you give some examples, what you are doing with it, so we could 
find a good name through this approach.

> I'm not sure that I have a better name for it, though.  "IO Stats" seems very accurate to me, though perhaps unintuitive (it seems fine to me, but perhaps that's because I'm familiar with the tool)? 
>
>  
I've asking some of my colleagues and they didn't get the name right, so 
it might only be that intuitive.

Nonetheless I'm still unhappy with "Throughput Graph" as I think you're 
right that it doesn't fit the purpose well.

First of all, I think "Graph" is a lot more descriptive than "Statistics".

"IO Statistics" is a bit too generic IMHO.

Some other names come to my mind:

Traffic Graph
Filtered Graph
User Specified Graph (my favorite!)

What do other's think?

Regards, ULFL