[Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

So does it mean we can make FT_UINT64 to be able to handle bitmasks?
What needs to be done?

Best regards
Michael

On 19. Feb 2004, at 7:52 Uhr, Dr. Uwe Girlich wrote:

> Hello!
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 12:37:10PM -0800, Guy Harris wrote:
> > Is that the MIPS-based platform where the native compiler doesn't 
> > support
> > 64-bit integral data types at all?
> ReliantUNIX 5.43 is MIPS 32 bits only but 5.44 and 5.45 (the current 
> and last
> (there will never be a follow-up)) are MIPS 64 bits with support for 
> %ll.
>
> > If so, is it OK if we require 64-bit
> > integral data type support in Ethereal, or should we fix up the places
> > where we currently use it?
> I use GCC for compiling on all systems, thus there is a 64 bit data 
> type
> available even on ReliantUNIX 5.43 and also SINIX-Z (really old 
> Siemens UNIX
> for i386).
>
> >     2) use our own routine to format 64-bit integers into strings, 
> > and use
> > that to generate output rather than using %ll/%q/%L/etc.
> That would be nice. I just looked up the source for such a decimal 
> formatter,
> which is really easy (if there is a 64 bit data type available).
>
> Bye, Uwe
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev