Hi,
I have checked the pull request and saw that it was merged into master
one month ago...
I shall eventually compile wireshark from master and test it with
_very large_ pcaps containing lots of SCTP associations :-)
I'll let you know.
Thanks a lot,
Cristian
On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 4:45 AM John Thacker <johnthacker@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 3:32 AM Cristian Constantin via Wireshark-dev <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jeff,
>>
>> Yes, after enabling the respective protocol decoding option, SCTP
>> association analysis works.
>> SCTP association analysis is _quite_ slow, though. I'll check why it
>> is so slow when I have some spare time.
>
>
> If you have some time, can you see if https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/merge_requests/13786
> works for you and if it's faster (at least the dissection part, this doesn't affect the tapping)? It works
> on my samples, and it uses hashmaps instead of lists so it should be better on large files.
>
> Thanks,
> John
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe