Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] SCTP association analysis & selection does not work correctl

From: Cristian Constantin <const.crist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 16:23:47 +0100
Hi,
How to figure out if a fix for an issue like the one mentioned by John
above is part of a Wireshark release? And what Wireshark release is
part of...

Thank you,
Cristian

On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 4:45 AM John Thacker <johnthacker@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 3:32 AM Cristian Constantin via Wireshark-dev <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jeff,
>>
>> Yes, after enabling the respective protocol decoding option, SCTP
>> association analysis works.
>> SCTP association analysis is _quite_ slow, though. I'll check why it
>> is so slow when I have some spare time.
>
>
> If you have some time, can you see if https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/merge_requests/13786
> works for you and if it's faster (at least the dissection part, this doesn't affect the tapping)? It works
> on my samples, and it uses hashmaps instead of lists so it should be better on large files.
>
> Thanks,
> John
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe