On 22/11/23 13:29, Pascal Quantin
      wrote:
    
    
      
      
        
        
        
        
          Le mer. 22 nov. 2023
            à 14:25, João Valverde <
j@xxxxxx>
            a écrit :
          
             
              On 22/11/23 13:12, Pascal Quantin wrote:
              
              
                
                  Hi Joao,
                  
                  
                  
                    Le mer. 22 nov.
                      2023 à 14:01, João Valverde <
j@xxxxxx> a
                      écrit :
                    
                       You are free to participate in the
                        discussion or not. But I really don't care to
                        wait for the new committee that is pretty much
                        exactly the same as the old committee, as far as
                        I can tell.
                        
                        Anyway silence is another Wireshark project
                        classic. At least you tried to bring something
                        to the debate, so thank you for that, at least.
                      
                    
                    
                    
                    It seems like the discussion is shifting away
                      from the initial goal. I don't think
                      aggression/criticism/sarcasm brings anything to
                      the debate, so I would prefer to keep a
                      constructive exchange between whoever feels
                      involved in the subject. I personally have never
                      used the Debian scripts, but I did not consider
                      updating the symbols list as being a really time
                      consuming task (and I did it numerous times in the
                      past), so I do not have an opinion on whether the
                      current status quo is good or bad.
                    Balint's initial email was to collect some
                      feedback regarding whether the scripts are being
                      used or not. Anders provided the first feedback,
                      let's see if others do (with the hope that they
                      are monitoring this list...).
                   
                 
              
              
              I'm not being aggressive, I'm being candid. And also
              expressing some pretty valid (IMO) criticisms.
            
 
          
          
             And let the discussion shift, what about it? I think
              it's all relevant to the issue of Debian packaging.
            
          
          
          
          
            Well that's all about communication. I personally find
              the emails you are sending today as being more and more
              aggressive. Maybe that's just me, or maybe this is the
              language / cultural differences, but I think it was worth
              notifying you as you might not be aware of how others can
              react to what you are writing.
           
         
       
    
    
    I apologize if the sarcasm in the committee line caused offense. I
    should have phrased that more gently.
    
    
      
      
      
      ___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe