You are free to participate in the discussion or not. But I really
don't care to wait for the new committee that is pretty much exactly
the same as the old committee, as far as I can tell.
Anyway silence is another Wireshark project classic. At least you
tried to bring something to the debate, so thank you for that, at
least.
On 22/11/23 11:45, Roland Knall wrote:
Hi
I would recommend that we bring this topic before the
technical steering committee. As of right now, that
committee needs to be formed in January and this topic is
exactly why we are going to have the committee in the first
place. The process is in the final steps and should be
finished by the end of the year anyway.
I do not think that further discussing this issue is
actually beneficial for the long term resolution of this
situation. Both sides have valid arguments and good pointers
and I would suggest as soon as the committee has taken up
the topic we collectively create a single mission statement
as suggested by Joao above. Until then, personally I will
refrain from discussing this further, as I have said
everything there is to say from my perspective.
Do you agree Gerald?
kind regards
Roland
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe