[Anders Broman <a.broman58@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I think that if you look at the commit history I have made my fair share of updating the list in the past. 

I was just trying to make the point that some found it useful to be able to build Deb packages and it might be more fruitful to discuss how that could be made easier? I think today the script tells you what symbols are missing perhaps it could just update the list, as an example. 

Best regards

Anders

Den ons 22 nov. 2023 12:36João Valverde <j@xxxxxx> skrev:

Maybe you´d like to volunteer to maintain the Wireshark Debian assets? Since you've got the experience and actually use it?

There are loads of lintian warnings waiting to be fixed, or there were until recently. Maybe you'd like to start there, and be more active staying on top of the all-important symbol lists. Just a thought.

On 21/11/23 15:00, Anders Broman wrote:

Hi,

I found it useful to be able to do Debian packages easily to provide internal installation packages and even ppa for Ubuntu. 

So I have been using the Debian build system.

Best regards 

Anders

Den tis 21 nov. 2023 15:48Roland Knall <rknall@xxxxxxxxx> skrev:

As mentioned on the ticket - just putting it here as well - I am against dropping packaging/debian. But I am for having it underneath packaging, and not in the main directory, which is what the original change was about. I respect Joao's opinion as well as yours Balint. In this case here I think, we can provide assistance for future implementors and as a starting point, by keeping the directory underneath packaging/debian. 

just my thoughts

Roland

Am Di., 21. Nov. 2023 um 15:28 Uhr schrieb Bálint Réczey <balint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

Hi All,

João shared his opinion about the project's commitment to maintain the
packaging/debian/ in the project's repository:

https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/commit/79da670bd1b4f91eebee5c96b19eaf1f33c94777#note_1656501952

I believe the current practice is reasonable and beneficial enough for
many parties to warrant the work, but I could be wrong.

Probably the most important question is if there is anyone relying on
the packaging scripts there. If you are, please speak up otherwise the
directory may be dropped.

Comments are welcome.

Cheers,
Balint
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe