https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5358
--- Comment #6 from Stéphane Bryant <stephane@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-11-19 04:38:26 PST ---
Absolutely, it's an overlook on my side, i will change this shortly.
(In reply to comment #5)
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-p2psip-base-12#section-13.2
>
> says:
>
> [[Note to RFC Editor - this paragraph can be removed before
> publication. ]] IANA has already allocated a TCP port for the main
> peer to peer protocol. This port has the name p2p-sip and the port
> number of 6084. IANA will update this registration to be defined for
> UDP as well as TCP.
>
> IANA will make the following port registration:
>
> +------------------------------+------------------------------------+
> | Registration Technical | Cullen Jennings <fluffy@xxxxxxxxx> |
> | Contact | |
> | Registration Owner | IETF <iesg@xxxxxxxx> |
> | Transport Protocol | TCP |
> | Port Number | TBD |
> | Service Name | p2psip-enroll |
> | Description | Peer to Peer Infrastructure |
> | | Enrollment |
> | Reference | [RFC-AAAA] |
> +------------------------------+------------------------------------+
>
> and, in fact, so does
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-p2psip-base-10#section-13.1
>
> and neither of them mention the number 3478 anywhere, so I'd say either give it
> port 6084, give it no port and give it a preference to set the port, or give it
> no port and register it as a possible UDP and TCP dissector so you can use
> Decode As... - do *NOT* register it for port 3478, as that's already assigned
> to STUN by the IANA.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.