https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5358
--- Comment #5 from Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-11-18 19:17:41 PST ---
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-p2psip-base-12#section-13.2
says:
[[Note to RFC Editor - this paragraph can be removed before
publication. ]] IANA has already allocated a TCP port for the main
peer to peer protocol. This port has the name p2p-sip and the port
number of 6084. IANA will update this registration to be defined for
UDP as well as TCP.
IANA will make the following port registration:
+------------------------------+------------------------------------+
| Registration Technical | Cullen Jennings <fluffy@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Contact | |
| Registration Owner | IETF <iesg@xxxxxxxx> |
| Transport Protocol | TCP |
| Port Number | TBD |
| Service Name | p2psip-enroll |
| Description | Peer to Peer Infrastructure |
| | Enrollment |
| Reference | [RFC-AAAA] |
+------------------------------+------------------------------------+
and, in fact, so does
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-p2psip-base-10#section-13.1
and neither of them mention the number 3478 anywhere, so I'd say either give it
port 6084, give it no port and give it a preference to set the port, or give it
no port and register it as a possible UDP and TCP dissector so you can use
Decode As... - do *NOT* register it for port 3478, as that's already assigned
to STUN by the IANA.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.