Ethereal-users: Re: [Ethereal-users] RE: TCP window size bug? (Arne Sagnes)

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
From: Arne Sagnes <ASagnes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 16:57:29 -0000
Rahul,
  please review the discussion I had with Olivier Biot and Jack Jackson.
;-)

Arne

On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 11:40, Rahul Sawarkar wrote:
> > Now, the interesting thing is that in another conversation,
> > that same hex value is translated to "33304", which I believe is the
> > correct value.
> You mean the window size field is 33304?
> Why do you beleive that 33304 is the correct value? Is it a holy number?
> Are you a 
> numerologist?
> 
> FYI You should  be aware that the the sender of a TCP packet advertises
> a window size to 
> the other end for the purpose of flow control. This can vary during the
> lifetime of a 
> connection.
> 
> There is nothing wrong here. You see?  Good night... Sleep tight...
> Don't fight... Be quite...
> 
> Don't bother with winscale and rfc1323 yet...
> 
> hic!
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-users mailing list
> Ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users
-- 
Arne Sagnes - Email: asagnes@xxxxxxxxxxx
Work: +1 440 949 8225 - Cell: +1 216 577 2319
Be careful of reading health books, you might die of a misprint.