On Dec 17, 2009, at 7:40 AM, Bill Meier wrote:
> FWIW: I don't know anything about the details of the bug but I note that
> the original poster of bug 3320 marked it as resolved/invalid 20 minutes
> after he submitted it (without any coment as to why).
Probably because he realized the same thing that Lars Ruoff pointed out - that 0x80 in the DS field is
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
| DSCP | CU |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
not
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
| DSCP | CU |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1