["Maynard, Christopher" <Christopher.Maynard@xxxxxxx>]

Many protocols contain subtrees, such as a header with various fields that are part of the header, and it’s convenient/logical to group those fields within the header subtree.  However, doing so results in a Packet Diagram that only shows the raw bytes of the subtree rather than the individual fields contained within the subtree.

 

So either I’m doing something wrong, in which case I welcome any suggestions for improving the display, or there seems to be a current limitation to the way the Packet Diagram behaves with respect to subtrees.  Has anyone else noticed this?

 

As an example, I’ve crafted together a Lua dissector for a fictional protocol, “Foo” along with an associated sample capture file to illustrate what I mean.  I’ve also attached an image of the Packet Diagram showing the “Foo Header” as raw bytes only.  What would be nicer to see are the individual header fields themselves, such as for this example:

 

Foo Header:

 

0            15 16            31

+-------------------------------+

|             Magic             |

+---------------+---------------+

|     Type      |     Length    |

+---------------+---------------+

 

Is there a way to achieve this while still grouping the fields within a subtree?

 

Thanks.

- Chris

 

 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is the property of International Game Technology PLC and/or its subsidiaries and may contain proprietary, confidential or trade secret information. This message is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this message in error, please delete this message from your system. Any unauthorized reading, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.

Attachment: foo_hdr.pcap
Description: foo_hdr.pcap

Attachment: foo.lua
Description: foo.lua