On 06/25/2014 09:27 PM, Alexis La Goutte wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 5:34 PM, <mmann78@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Michael
>> To the discussion on "generated" source files - I still can't build the
>> DCERPC files on Windows (I blame Yapp, but it could also be ignorance). It
>> would be GREAT if the build magicians could fix that.
>>
>> However, thanks to Evan at Sharkfest, I now have a lubuntu setup that I am
>> trying to learn. The proto_tree_add_subtree effort has afforded me another
>> excuse to try to regenerate the DCERPC files. Following the instructions
>> (always a good a start), I was able to regenerate the dissectors from the
>> .idl files in epan/dissectors/pidl base directory on my lubuntu setup. I
>> could not generate the "subdirectory" ones (mapi, nspi, rfr) or the ones in
>> the epan/dissectors/dcerpc. As a "sanity check", I downloaded all of samba
>> to compare.
> What procedure do you have use ? because i have always problem when i
> try to regenerate Pidl dissector
>
>>
>> In diffing the samba code to Wireshark, there were no significant (or
>> unexplanable) changes in the (wireshark) tools/pidl directories. However,
>> it doesn't appear that samba has the idl files that I can't build (mapi,
>> nspi, rfr, budb, butc). Are these somehow "Wireshark only" (did someone not
>> put them in samba or did samba take them out)? Do they need to be updated
>> to the most recent pidl compiler? I can provide build errors, but they
>> didn't make much sense to me, especially since some of the "base" idl files
>> had build errors, but still managed to generate a dissector.
>
> May be add Samba Team in CC ? like this topic
>
> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201310/msg00219.html
>
>
That would be Jelmer Vernooij I guess, see https://www.samba.org/~jelmer/
Thanks,
Jaap