On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 5:34 PM, <mmann78@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Michael
> To the discussion on "generated" source files - I still can't build the
> DCERPC files on Windows (I blame Yapp, but it could also be ignorance). It
> would be GREAT if the build magicians could fix that.
>
> However, thanks to Evan at Sharkfest, I now have a lubuntu setup that I am
> trying to learn. The proto_tree_add_subtree effort has afforded me another
> excuse to try to regenerate the DCERPC files. Following the instructions
> (always a good a start), I was able to regenerate the dissectors from the
> .idl files in epan/dissectors/pidl base directory on my lubuntu setup. I
> could not generate the "subdirectory" ones (mapi, nspi, rfr) or the ones in
> the epan/dissectors/dcerpc. As a "sanity check", I downloaded all of samba
> to compare.
What procedure do you have use ? because i have always problem when i
try to regenerate Pidl dissector
>
> In diffing the samba code to Wireshark, there were no significant (or
> unexplanable) changes in the (wireshark) tools/pidl directories. However,
> it doesn't appear that samba has the idl files that I can't build (mapi,
> nspi, rfr, budb, butc). Are these somehow "Wireshark only" (did someone not
> put them in samba or did samba take them out)? Do they need to be updated
> to the most recent pidl compiler? I can provide build errors, but they
> didn't make much sense to me, especially since some of the "base" idl files
> had build errors, but still managed to generate a dissector.
May be add Samba Team in CC ? like this topic
http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201310/msg00219.html
>
> Michael
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe