Done in r48415. Now we wait...
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:47 AM, Pascal Quantin
<pascal.quantin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2013/3/19 Evan Huus <eapache@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Would anyone object to a g_warning if an extended value string has to
>> fall back to linear search? It probably indicates either a typo in the
>> value-string or somebody not understanding how extended value strings
>> work.
>>
>> Didn't want to put this in without asking because if there is a reason
>> I'm not aware of it would cause a ton of fuzz failures.
>>
>> Evan
>>
>> P.S. I thought of this while digging around thinking about
>> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8467 - I'm still
>> technically waiting for the original reporter to ACK it, but if anyone
>> else has feedback it would be appreciated.
>
>
> Hi Evan,
>
> +1 on my side. It would allow to clean the tables.
>
> Pascal.
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe