-----Original Message-----
>From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jakub
>Zawadzki
>Sent: den 31 oktober 2012 11:43
>To: wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Reverting proto_tree_reset()
>
>Hi,
>
>in r45669 I added two new functions: epan_dissect_reset, proto_tree_reset.
>
>In BTS we have got bug #2047[1] which is something simillar, but:
>
> 1/ IMHO it has minimal impact for speed, and this functions duplicates some code.
>
> 2/ major thing for me was to make referencing (HF_REF_TYPE_DIRECT),
> and unreferencing (HF_REF_TYPE_NONE) hfinfo->ref_type multi-thread dissection safe.
>
>
>But achieving #2 can be done with some simpler code, rename dfilter_prime_proto_tree to dfilter_prime() +
>remove tree argument, and use new function after compiling dfilter and *before* dissection loops.
>
>Create new function dfilter_unprime() which unreference hfs, and call this funcion *after* dissection loop.
>
>
>last point, r45669 is buggy, it never set hfi->ref_type back to HF_REF_TYPE_NONE.
>
>
>So, I'll probably revert r45669, and fix it like I described above, I can prepare patch if anyone want to do
>review?
>
Dunno what to do with bug #2047 WONTFIX? Anders?
[1] https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2047
The code has changed to much since this patch was created and it was part of a
large set of patches not made by me. Closing as WONTFIX as suggested :-)
Regards
Anders
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe