["Wen Cheng" <wencheng@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

 

Yes, I have tried this dissector and it is as good as wimaxasncp. I think it is also acceptable if it was submitted earlier.

 

My employer, CIeNET technologies, is improving this dissector based on the feedbacks from the community. I believe a better WiMAX ASN control message dissector will be available soon. The efforts will be merged by then.

 

Thanks
 

On 10/5/07, Martin Mathieson <martin.r.mathieson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

Have you looked at this new submission in detail, or tried it out?

Does it handle anything that is missing from the current one we have, or handle something in a better way?

I don't actually work with WiMAX, and haven't asked colleagues who do to play with this new submission.  I was hoping that the original submitter would test the existing dissector and do a comparison for us.

Martin

On 10/5/07, Wen Cheng < wencheng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I think the effort can be merged into wimaxasncp dissector.

On 10/4/07, bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote:

http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1848





------- Comment #3 from martin.r.mathieson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2007-10-04 13:58 GMT -------
Any thoughts on this? Do you believe the bug should now be cancelled?


--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-bugs mailing list
Wireshark-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-bugs

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev