Thanks, I hadn't fully read that thread. Could you write up a little
section for README.developer that describes how this functionality is
used and then I'll commit these. Thanks.
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 09:59:13PM +0100, Sebastien Tandel wrote:
> It was discussed in the thread with Guy
> (http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200701/msg02454.html) ...
> >> re-post of a patch described here ...
> >> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200701/msg00321.html
> >>
> >
> > Is there any way to avoid having to OR that one value when using an
> > RVAL()? It would be a lot cleaner / easier for people to use if so.