Hi Steve,
It was discussed in the thread with Guy
(http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200701/msg02454.html) ...
Regards,
Sebastien Tandel
>> re-post of a patch described here ...
>> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200701/msg00321.html
>>
>
> Is there any way to avoid having to OR that one value when using an
> RVAL()? It would be a lot cleaner / easier for people to use if so.
>
>
> Steve
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>