Joerg Mayer wrote:
Two remarks:
Changing 2412000 kHz to 2,412,000 kHz will cause problems if we ever
add i18n. Maybe just 2412 MHz would be even more readable?
You're right, that looks better. I'll changed it this way.
Is there a specific reason why you replace the technical term (BSSID
list) by a non-technical term (Available networks)?
Yes, it's much better understandable if you don't have the technical
specification at hand :-)
However, I've replaced it with: "Available networks (BSSID list)"
Regards, ULFL