Comment # 7
on bug 10690
from Martin Kaiser
(In reply to Guy Harris from comment #5)
> (In reply to Martin Kaiser from comment #3)
> > IMHO, it should only be possible to index
> > a string or a field, not ... another range.
>
> With your change, does "frame contains frame[4-7][2-3]" do the same thing
> that it did before? (It doesn't crash without your change, although I
> haven't checked to see whether it's equivalent to "frame contains
> frame[6-7]", as I'd expect it to be.)
Ok, now I understand what a range of a range is supposed to be. I modified my
patch to allow this.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.