Evan Huus
 changed
              bug 8529
        
             
          
            | What | 
            Removed | 
            Added | 
          
         
           | Status | 
           UNCONFIRMED
            | 
           CONFIRMED
            | 
         
         
           | CC | 
           
                
            | 
           [email protected]
            | 
         
         
           | Ever confirmed | 
           
                
            | 
           1
            | 
         
      
        
            Comment # 1
              on bug 8529
              from  Evan Huus
        This is a known behaviour and has to do with a few oddities of the way the
dissection engine is called from wireshark vs from tshark (you are correct that
it has to do with the fact that resp_in is a 'future-dependent' field).
We're still trying to figure out what the best way to implement/fix this is,
there have been a few long discussions on the mailing list already.
Most recent one starts at:
https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201303/msg00008.html
If the larger problem ends up with a master bug this one will likely end up
marked as a duplicate of it. Until then I'm afraid there isn't much of a
workaround, sorry. Just use wireshark where possible.
Evan
         
      
      
      You are receiving this mail because:
      
      
          - You are watching all bug changes.