Evan Huus
changed
bug 8529
What |
Removed |
Added |
Status |
UNCONFIRMED
|
CONFIRMED
|
CC |
|
[email protected]
|
Ever confirmed |
|
1
|
Comment # 1
on bug 8529
from Evan Huus
This is a known behaviour and has to do with a few oddities of the way the
dissection engine is called from wireshark vs from tshark (you are correct that
it has to do with the fact that resp_in is a 'future-dependent' field).
We're still trying to figure out what the best way to implement/fix this is,
there have been a few long discussions on the mailing list already.
Most recent one starts at:
https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201303/msg00008.html
If the larger problem ends up with a master bug this one will likely end up
marked as a duplicate of it. Until then I'm afraid there isn't much of a
workaround, sorry. Just use wireshark where possible.
Evan
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.