Comment # 26
on bug 8089
from Chris Bontje
(In reply to comment #25)
> (In reply to comment #24)
> > (In reply to comment #23)
> > > Created attachment 9769 [details]
> > > Another pass at using wmem
> > >
> > > Just a stupid typo fix from previous version.
> >
> > A first quick look at the code looks great! It all looks much cleaner than
> > before with the glib memory handling. Which dissector test case did you
> > think looked 'off'?
>
> I didn't notice a particular one being off, but I don't really know what
> it's supposed to look like - all I did was a quick before-and-after on one
> of the samples you provided. It *looked* fine...
LOL, got it! I'll check the new code versus all the captures I have and make
sure the output behavior is the same.
Chris
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.