Comment # 25
on bug 8089
from Evan Huus
(In reply to comment #24)
> (In reply to comment #23)
> > Created attachment 9769 [details]
> > Another pass at using wmem
> >
> > Just a stupid typo fix from previous version.
>
> A first quick look at the code looks great! It all looks much cleaner than
> before with the glib memory handling. Which dissector test case did you
> think looked 'off'?
I didn't notice a particular one being off, but I don't really know what it's
supposed to look like - all I did was a quick before-and-after on one of the
samples you provided. It *looked* fine...
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.