https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2981
Peter Harris <peter.harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #2809|review_for_checkin? |
Flag| |
Attachment #2809 is|0 |1
obsolete| |
Attachment #3641| |review_for_checkin?
Flag| |
--- Comment #23 from Peter Harris <peter.harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-09-10 11:30:16 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=3641)
--> (https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3641)
Patch to add extension support v6
Okay, the opcode line was already special-cased, so it was relatively
straight-forward to special-case it a little bit more.
QueryExtension-reply-major_opcode isn't already special-cased, so it would be
more intrusive to fix. I don't believe it's that critical, since the
QueryExtension-request will be nearby in the protocol stream.
Otherwise, v6 does the trivial stuff (check_col, NULL instead of "" in hf_
entries, and the default-case omission comment). Plus it was rebased onto
r29841, and uses the latest Mesa and XCB/proto upstreams.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.