http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1879
guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Platform|PC |All
------- Comment #1 from guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-09-30 20:05 GMT -------
...thus opening the potential for endless debate about the layer to which a
particular protocol belongs, as per my comment on the Debian bug.
A UI to specify particular protocols that should be displayed as closed (or
possibly not displayed at all), along with protocols below it - and possibly
also to display layers below which protocols should be displayed as closed -
might be better. For example, one might do
tshark -V --close-at-and-below tcp
(assuming GNU-style options; getopt() doesn't support them, but getopt_long()
does, and is available in at least some of the BSDs as well as Linux; we could
include the glibc code on platforms that don't support getopt_long()).
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.