http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1179
------- Comment #20 from frederic.heem@xxxxxxxxx 2006-10-26 12:24 GMT -------
(In reply to comment #19)
> I.e., the change isn't being put in because it didn't compile without the
> changes, it's being put in because it might, in the future, not compile without
> the changes.
>
> BTW, why is the full dbus patch doing
>
> -/** Stop a low-level capture (stops the capture child). */
> -extern void capture_loop_stop(void);
> +/** Stop all captures (stops the capture child). */
> +extern void capture_loop_stop();
>
> That changes a declaration that says "capture_loop_stop() takes no arguments"
> to one that says "capture_loop_stop() takes an unknown number of arguments",
> and thus disables compile-time checking of calls to capture_loop_stop().
>
I can't even remember why it has been changed, this is a mistake.
extern void capture_loop_stop(void) has to be used.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.