["GRL" <giovrell@xxxxxx>]

Will it be the possibility of the string match in the future?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Guy Harris" <gharris@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Ethereal user support" <ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 9:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Ethereal-users] http content capture filter


> NOEL, ANDRE wrote:
>
> > Is there any way to do a capture filter based on the HTTP data content ?
> >  I want to capture Every packet that contains  the word   CONNECT.
>
> There's no general "string match" instruction in the BPF pseudo-machine
> used for capture filters, nor are there any backwards branches in the
> BPF pseudo-machines in various OS kernels (so that you can't load a
> pseudo-program that can loop infinitely), so there's no way to look for
> CONNECT at any arbitrary offset in the packet.
>
> You can look for it at a *specific* offset in the packet, although it's
> not easy to construct the expression:
>
> http://home.insight.rr.com/procana/#Payload
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-users mailing list
> Ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.6 - Release Date: 07/02/2005
>
>




-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.6 - Release Date: 07/02/2005