Oliver,
I tried unchecking all the Name Resolution selections and it didn't seem
to help. I am running WinPcap 3.0. which seems to be the latest
released version. Do I need to be running a beta version?
Just to reiterate: I am able to capture packets just fine as long as I
don't check "Update list of packets in real time".
Thanks for your help
Doug
-----Original Message-----
From: Olivier Biot [mailto:ethereal@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 4:00 PM
To: Douglas Burdett
Cc: ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Ethereal-users] Problem on Windows XP with "Update list of
packetsin real time"
Doug,
This is strange. It works on my computer (0.10.8 with WinPcap 3.1 beta3)
on
my wireless link (ATMEL chip, no promiscuous mode).
Try starting a capture while unticking the "Enable network name
resolution"
option in the capture options dialog.
Best regards,
Olivier
----- Original Message -----
From: Douglas Burdett
> Oliver,
>
> I tried toggling the "Enable concurrent DNS name resolution" and got
the
> same result whether it was enabled if disabled.
>
> Doug
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olivier Biot
>
> This is probably related to the address-to-name resolutions, which may
> take
> time to complete (e.g., temporarily slow name server). On Ethereal
> 0.10.8,
> go to Edit > Preferences, and select "Name Resolution" from the left
> pane.
> There are 2 options:
> 1. Enable concurrent DNS was disabled. Enable it and perform another
> test.
> 2. If this fails, I guess Enable network name resolution is enabled.
> Disable
> it and perform another test.
>
> Should you still have problems, then reply to this post.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Olivier
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Douglas Burdett
>
> I am a new user of Ethereal on Windows XP SP2 but I am having no luck
> using
> the "Update list of packets in real time" option on the Capture. When
I
>
> select that option, the Ethereal hangs and must be closed from the
Task
> Manager. After the Ethereal is cancelled then I see the capture begin
> to
> function.
>
> As I understand it, whenever the "Update list of packets in real time"
> option is selected, the capture is executed as a separate task which
> writes
> into the capture file, while the original Ethereal task reads data
from
> that
> file. It seems to me that the Capture task is somehow prevented from
> running until the original Ethereal is cancelled.
>
> Obviously that defeats the purpose of the "Update list of packets in
> real
> time" option. Can anyone suggest a possible cause for this and more
> importantly, a solution?
>
> Thanks
> Doug Burdett