["ronnie sahlberg" <ronniesahlberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Gerald,

Can you add 18002 to the release branch?

It is a very safe patch with very little risk of destabilizing the code.

It fixes an issue where version 4 of NDMP has dropped a parameter for
two function calls   which resulted in these PDUs as showing up as
malformed in ethereal.



I would eventually want to see the recent fc/fcp/iscsi/scsi changes in
a release version as well    but the changes made are quite extensive
and intrusive.
When 0.99 is out,   will you sync upp all changes from trunk to the
release branch   or will this happen after the 1.0 release?
(no urgency for me,   i just point my users to the buildbot builds  
and that is fine for us)




On 4/19/06, Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 09:30:09AM +0200, Anders Broman (AL/EAB) wrote:
> > Should we then do something like this?
> > April 24  0.99.0
> >
> > May 22 0.99.1
> >
> > June 19  0.99.2
> >
> > July 14 1.0
> >
> > Or 0.99.0 directly to 1.0? Or 0.99.0 and 0.99.1?
>
> Just do one step of the roadmap after the other. A step will be finished
> once the goals for it have been met. No need to set dates. Just see when
> all the requirements have been fulfilled.
>
>  Ciao
>      Joerg
> --
> Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
> works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
>