Ethereal-dev: RE: [Ethereal-dev] Last 4 days fixes and the 1.0 release

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: "Anders Broman (AL/EAB)" <anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 09:30:09 +0200
Hi,
Should we then do something like this?
April 24  0.99.0

May 22 0.99.1

June 19  0.99.2

July 14 1.0

Or 0.99.0 directly to 1.0? Or 0.99.0 and 0.99.1?

Brg
Anders
 

-----Original Message-----
From: ethereal-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ethereal-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gerald Combs
Sent: den 19 april 2006 04:31
To: Ethereal development
Subject: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Last 4 days fixes and the 1.0 release

I didn't set a schedule for each of the milestones on
http://wiki.ethereal.com/Development/Roadmap since I wasn't sure when
each pending item would be completed.  Should we set a hard date for the
1.0 release?  (This upcoming July 14 will be Ethereal's 8th
anniversary.)

Gilbert Ramirez wrote:
> Sorry that I haven't paid close attention to this, but what's the 
> time-frame for getting new features into the beta? I'm working on 
> adding functions to the display filter language... to support lower() 
> and upper() in string comparisons, but it's still going to be a while.
> 
> I'm fine with whatever schedule there is, but by knowing the time 
> frame I should be able to figure out if I target a release into the 
> beta branch, or just wait for some other future window after the 1.0 
> release.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> --gilbert
> 
> On 4/18/06, Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> W. Borgert wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> will the fixes of the last 4 days be integrated into the upcoming 
>>> 1.0 release? None, all, some? E.g. I would like to see the GIOP 
>>> fixes in 1.0. Thanks in advance.
>> I have the following revisions slated to be copied from /trunk to
>> /trunk-1.0:
>>
>> 17860: Null pointer exception in win32-file-dlg.c
>> 17861: Skip non-data records in the Network Instruments code (bug 
>> 767)
>> 17865: Fractional timestamp fix (bug 865)
>> 17874: hcidump file fix
>>
>> Which GIOP revisions should be copied?  Is there anything else that 
>> should go into 0.99.0?
>>
>> I'll work on them this afternoon if I can stay out of meetings long
enough.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ethereal-dev mailing list
>> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev

_______________________________________________
Ethereal-dev mailing list
Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev