Hi David,
I guess this sounds familiar to many of us, fixing stuff "on the job". If
we can close the feedback loop to the source repository we all benefit.
That's the beauty of OSS. So gather all your strength and post the patch.
We all support you ;)
Thanx,
Jaap
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006, David Richards wrote:
> I have a spec at work and can take a look. I already have a bunch of
> other fixes compiled into my version of Ethereal based on my usage with
> BACnet anyway. I've just been slow to submit them. Most vendors
> implement only tiny fractions of the BACnet spec and there are some
> parts that I suspect no one ever will implement, so there are probably a
> host of other bugs that won't show up for a long time if ever. I just
> fix the one's I run into at work.
>
> Dave Richards
>
> Jaap Keuter wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, ronnie sahlberg wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>option 2 is to just close the bugs with the explanation : none with
> >>standard available willing to fix bug. bug closed due to impossibility
> >>to fix.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >There's a resolution for that: "WONTFIX"
> >If we need to do that we may explain why we use this resolution
> >
> >Thanx,
> >Jaap
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Ethereal-dev mailing list
> >Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> >http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
>