AFAIK Q.SIG is Q.931 + some parameters and should be supported by the
current q931 dissector.
On 3/13/06, Ulf Lamping <ulf.lamping@xxxxxx> wrote:
> John Neiberger wrote:
> > I would really love to see support for Q.SIG in Ethereal and I didn't
> > see it on the current wish list. The Wiki page said to check here
> > before adding anything to the wish list, so I'm checking.
> >
> >
> Congratulation! You're the first one I know that actually follow the
> "official" process :-)
>
> This is just to prevent invalid and/or duplicate entries.
>
> I don't know anything about Q.SIG, you may just add it to the WishList.
> > As an FYI, my company is about to roll out a fairly large IP telephony
> > project that will involve a lot of Q.SIG interaction. It would be
> > extremely helpful to be able to span that traffic over to Ethereal for
> > analysis
> You may start a new Wiki page about this protocol and include a trace
> file and the protocol specs, making it much more likely that it will be
> implemented.
>
> However, there are no guarantees that it actually will be implemented at
> all, until you do the job yourself or find someone to do it.
>
> Regards, ULFL
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
>
--
This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself.
-- Marshall McLuhan