Ethereal-dev: SV: [Ethereal-dev] [Camel] BER error
Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.
Hi, Well the previous (ethereal) def was: InitialDPArgExtension ::= SEQUENCE What document holds the def as:
InitialDPArgExtension ::= SEQUENCE { Which I agree is not compatible, but the *new* one should be compatible to the old ethereal one: InitialDPArgExtension ::= SEQUENCE { gmscAddress [0] ISDN-AddressString OPTIONAL, forwardingDestinationNumber [1] CalledPartyNumber OPTIONAL, ms-Classmark2 [2] MS-Classmark2 OPTIONAL, iMEI [3] IMEI OPTIONAL, supportedCamelPhases [4] SupportedCamelPhases OPTIONAL, offeredCamel4Functionalities [5] OfferedCamel4Functionalities OPTIONAL, bearerCapability2 [6] BearerCapability OPTIONAL, ext-basicServiceCode2 [7] Ext-BasicServiceCode OPTIONAL, highLayerCompatibility2 [8] HighLayerCompatibility OPTIONAL, lowLayerCompatibility [9] LowLayerCompatibility OPTIONAL, lowLayerCompatibility2 [10] LowLayerCompatibility OPTIONAL, ..., enhancedDialledServicesAllowed [11] NULL OPTIONAL, uu-Data [12] UU-Data OPTIONAL }
The trace can be found in http://www.ethereal.com/lists/ethereal-dev/200511/msg00297.html And the OID is application-context-name: 0.4.0.0.1.0.50.1 (itu-t(0) identified-organization(4) etsi(0) mobileDomain(0) gsm-Network|umts-Network(1) applicationContext(0) cap-gsmssf-to-gsmscf(50) version2(1))
Brg Anders
-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Anders, Olivier,
The definition I have for Camel Phase 2 is...
InitialDPArgExtension ::=
SEQUENCE { It looks like the definition in Ethereal is a phase 3 version, which is unusual because it doesn't seem to be backwards compatible, can you send the trace over and then we should be able to work out which phase it is from the OID and put some OID specific code in.
Tim
|
- References:
- RE: [Ethereal-dev] [Camel] BER error
- From: Tim
- RE: [Ethereal-dev] [Camel] BER error
- Prev by Date: Re: SV: [Ethereal-dev] Modifications to the LDAP dissector
- Next by Date: [Ethereal-dev] Re: Statistics generation: exponential instead of linear time?
- Previous by thread: SV: [Ethereal-dev] [Camel] BER error
- Next by thread: [Ethereal-dev] [Patch] to PPPoE dissector
- Index(es):