["Oren Mazor" <oren.mazor@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:25:08 -0400, Lars Ruoff <Lars.Ruoff@xxxxxxxxxx>  
wrote:

> > Indeed. I just updated to 11 on a production box and my dissector's
> > failing pretty valiantly on line 2767 of proto.c
> >
> > DISSECTOR_ASSERT(*ptr->p_id == -1 || *ptr->p_id == 0)
> >
> > just when i actually really needed it to work...
> >
> > dont think that's very related to the problem at hand, no?
>
> Yes, it is!

super! is there a [quick, or not so much] fix? other than hunting for a  
0.10.10 rpm?

I'm trying to track down what's happening here, and what field is not -1  
or 0 when it gets to that point...

> > On 6/21/05, Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Gerald,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 03:46:29PM +0200, Lars Ruoff wrote:
> > > > Plugins (at least on Windows) have become binary-incompatible  
> > between
> > > > 0.10.10 and 0.10.11 .
> > > > I warned about that in
> > > > http://www.ethereal.com/lists/ethereal-dev/200505/msg00015.html, but
> it
> > > > didn't get much attention.
> > >
> > > I think this should also go into the news file. Incompatible changes  
> > to
> > > the command line (remove, changed parameters) should also be noted.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >        Joerg
> > > --
> > > Joerg Mayer                                            
> > <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff  
> > that
> > > works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Ethereal-dev mailing list
> > > Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ethereal-dev mailing list
> > Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev



--
BOFH excuse #439:

Hot Java has gone cold