[Ulf Lamping <ulf.lamping@xxxxxx>]

Gerald Combs wrote:

> Ulf Lamping wrote:
>
>  
>
> > What do you think about labeling (or whatever the correct term for
> > subversion is) the current files in that repository to 0.10.7 (so we can
> > get back to that version later).
> >
> > After that we could remove files no longer needed, like the gtk2
> > directory (as the gtk2.4 dir is used now AFAIK).
> >
> > So people only have to download the things they needed for the current
> > version, and we create a history for the future so find back the right
> > files of previous versions will become a lot easier.
> >    
>
> I was thinking we could modify Makefile.nmake and/or win32-setup.sh to
> point to a specific file revision in the SVN repository for downloads.
> However, it's a lot more straightforward to create a branch in the
> repository, as you suggested.
>
> A branch for the current set of libraries has been created in
> "tags/2004-11-02" (unlike CVS, SVN makes no distinction between tags and
> branches; both are just copies of the trunk).  win32-setup.sh has been
> changed to use the new path.
>
>  
Is there any reason to not use the same tags as the corresponding 
Ethereal release like 0.10.7?

That would make it much easier to match Ethereal released sources with 
the corresponding libs IMHO.

Regards, ULFL