Ethereal-dev: RE: [Ethereal-dev] 0.10.3 release later this week?
Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.
From: Biot Olivier <Olivier.Biot@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 11:50:25 +0200
Personally I now always build with GTK2 (with the *new* gtk-wimp 0.5.4) and with ENABLE_LIBETHEREAL=USE and everything works smoothly. The installer then is only 7 MB in size (shared libethereal, no GTK1). Before we release 0.10.4 I'd *really* like that we put the new gtk-wimp in the Win32 distribution (this requires an edit to the top-level Makefile.nmake too) and upload it to the Ethereal web site. The only changes I required for this are in config.nmake and Makefile.nmake: $ diff -u ../../ethereal/Makefile.nmake Makefile.nmake --- ../../ethereal/Makefile.nmake 2004-05-13 08:21:51.217963200 +0200 +++ Makefile.nmake 2004-05-10 08:21:38.369291200 +0200 @@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ @$(SH) tools\win32-setup.sh --download "$(ETHEREAL_LIBS)" \ gtk2 gtk2/atk-dev-1.4.0.zip @$(SH) tools\win32-setup.sh --download "$(ETHEREAL_LIBS)" \ - gtk-wimp gtk2/gtk-wimp-0.5.3-bin.zip + gtk-wimp gtk2/gtk-wimp-0.5.4-bin.zip !ENDIF @echo. @echo Ethereal is ready to build. $ diff -u ../../ethereal/config.nmake config.nmake --- ../../ethereal/config.nmake 2004-05-13 08:21:51.608524800 +0200 +++ config.nmake 2004-05-13 09:59:36.652043200 +0200 @@ -53,8 +53,8 @@ # the pathname of the directory in which the "include" and "lib" directories # reside. # -GTK1_DIR=$(ETHEREAL_LIBS)\gtk+ -#GTK2_DIR=$(ETHEREAL_LIBS)\gtk2 +#GTK1_DIR=$(ETHEREAL_LIBS)\gtk+ +GTK2_DIR=$(ETHEREAL_LIBS)\gtk2 # # If you have GTK-Wimp, set this to the pathname of the directory in @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ # If you don't have GTK-Wimp, comment this line out, so that GTK-Wimp isn't # defined. # -#GTK_WIMP_DIR=$(ETHEREAL_LIBS)\gtk-wimp +GTK_WIMP_DIR=$(ETHEREAL_LIBS)\gtk-wimp # # If you have Zlib, set this to the pathname of the directory in @@ -130,7 +130,8 @@ PDB_FILE=vc*.pdb # Set path if you need to find some binary -PATH=c:\cygwin\bin;c:\python23;$(PATH) +#PATH=c:\cygwin\bin;c:\python23;$(PATH) +PATH=c:\cygwin\bin;$(PATH) # Set path to some required DLLs PATH=$(GLIB_DIR)\bin;$(GETTEXT_DIR)\bin;$(ICONV_DIR)\bin;$(PATH) @@ -139,7 +140,8 @@ PERL=perl POD2MAN=$(SH) pod2man POD2HTML=$(SH) pod2html -PYTHON="C:/python23/python.exe" +#PYTHON="C:/python23/python.exe" +PYTHON="C:/cygwin/bin/python2.3.exe" LEX=flex YACC=bison @@ -165,9 +167,10 @@ # comment this line out, so that DOXYGEN isn't defined. # #DOXYGEN="C:/program files/doxygen/bin/doxygen.exe" +DOXYGEN="C:/cygwin/bin/doxygen.exe" # If you wan't to build a libethereal.dll, you should comment out the following line -#ENABLE_LIBETHEREAL=USE +ENABLE_LIBETHEREAL=USE # # You should not have to change anything below this comment. Regards, Olivier |-----Original Message----- |From: Ian Schorr | | |With talk of a new release, was there final consensus on this? Will |GTK+2 be the GUI default for 0.10.4? | |If changed in the Windows installer, should it also be the configure |default? I'd like this just based on personal preference but I'm sure |others would disagree. | |Gerald Combs wrote: | |> Ulf Lamping wrote: |> |>> How do we want to handle the (newer) win32 GTK related topics, |>> changing the installer defaults since the last release: |>> |>> a) do we want to set GTK2 as the default for the installer now? |>> As I have shipped like this for my "personal releases", it doesn't |>> seem to have any bugs or such :-) |>> This requires to make minor changes to packaging/nsis/ethereal.nsi.
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: [Ethereal-dev] 0.10.3 release later this week?
- From: Graham Bloice
- RE: [Ethereal-dev] 0.10.3 release later this week?
- Prev by Date: [Ethereal-dev] Re: [PATCH] packet-snmp.c
- Next by Date: [Ethereal-dev] Win32 NSIS Ethereal "upgrade" scenario
- Previous by thread: Re: [Ethereal-dev] 0.10.3 release later this week?
- Next by thread: RE: [Ethereal-dev] 0.10.3 release later this week?
- Index(es):