[Ian Schorr <ethereal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I did have two copies installed, an older(?) version looks like it was 
sitting in /usr/lib.  However, I did have the 0.8.1 copies of files in 
/usr/local/include and /usr/local/lib.

For grins I copied the same 0.8.1 files into /usr/lib and /usr/include, 
but I'm seeing the same errors.  I probably still have something badly 
set up, but any other ideas?

I do appear to only have these two copies of of the libpcap files.

Ian

On Apr 20, 2004, at 3:56 PM, Guy Harris wrote:

> Probably because it's also not trying to link "/usr/lib" - if you have 
> the
> security update or 10.3.3, you have a libpcap with all those routines.
>
> Do you have *two* versions of libpcap installed - one in "/usr" (the 
> one
> that comes with OS X) and one in "/usr/local/{include,lib}"?  If so, 
> you
> want to make sure that the header files in "/usr/local/include" match 
> the
> headers in "/usr/local/lib" - i.e., if you copied the 0.8.1 headers to
> "/usr/local/include", you'd better have 0.8.1's library installed in
> "/usr/local/lib".