[Laurent Deniel <laurent.deniel@xxxxxxx>]

Guy Harris wrote:

> Over time, we'll probably be getting a number of different scripts for
> post-processing Tethereal output, processing capture files, and so on.
>
> Should we include those in a "scripts" subdirectory in the Ethereal

Yes, a 'scripts' or 'contrib' directory is OK.

> distribution?  That's more convenient for people who get that version of
> Ethereal, although unless those scripts are installed somewhere they
> wouldn't be useful to somebody who gets a binary distribution.  That
> doesn't make them conveniently available before they're put into a
> release, however.

That's the same with patch so don't bother about that (they could be
retrieved from CVS anyway ...

> Should we put them in a collection of scripts on the Ethereal Web site? 
> That makes them immediately available, but you have to go download them
> - you don't get them with Ethereal.
>
> Should we do both?