Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Another Windows-only sniffer: PacScope ...

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: Kevin <kem2@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 22:42:26 -0400

On Tuesday, September 2, 2003, at 05:57 PM, Andreas Sikkema wrote:


Richard Sharpe wrote:
I
imagine that most people who use Ethereal seriously use it for its
analysis capabilities rather than for capturing.

You are wrong ;-). Most people I know and we use Ethereal daily (eh
hourly, er very minute some days) never, ever use tethereal. I have
never seen anyone use it acutally...


Ummm, we use tethereal all the time, chopping down large (>8 GB) traces quickly, pulling out stats using -z. Driving it with scripts is a easy way to get work done. I can email or im someone who knows nothing about tethereal a command line to drive it and do a capture. This is great at 2 am. Also, i can run tethereal over a dial up connection, not easy to do with X.

Ethereal is used almost exclusively for post-capture analysis, not capture. For that we will use tcpdump, tethereal, snoop, thg, etc to minimize the overhead and prevent dropping packets.

I guess this shows the flexibility of ethereal and how it fills so many different needs.

Kevin