[David Frascone <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree with the one liner that Hamish posted a few (hundred?) message ago,
something where there was added freedom to link with OpenSSL.  I do *not*
like the previous messages completely open license.  

The license should be changed now, IMHO, but not changed so much that it would
make it vunerable to abuse.  

And, I do think that any change should take the same kind of debate that we've
been doing over the last few days.  License changes should not be taken
lightly.  We would all be very upset if the Borg assimilated our code and
started selling it for large sums of money.

Just my $.02 worth,


-Dave

On Tuesday, 26 Mar 2002, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> 
> Yes I think you are. There is only one GPL. Ethereal's license would
> be GPL with an added freedom to link with OpenSSL. The only license
> that would be incompatible would be one with an added restriction
> against linking with OpenSSL.
> 

-- 
David Frascone

             Take my advice, I don't use it anyway.