[Gilbert Ramirez <gram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 08 Feb 2002 08:55:51 Erik Inge Bols� wrote:
> 
> #0  0x403e99f1 in __kill () from /lib/libc.so.6
> #1  0x403e96d4 in raise (sig=6) at ../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:27
> #2  0x403eae31 in abort () at ../sysdeps/generic/abort.c:88
> #3  0x40290bfe in g_logv () at eval.c:88
> #4  0x40290cb2 in g_log () at eval.c:88
> #5  0x81d2bf2 in alloc_field_info (tree=0x847a514, hfindex=3937, tvb=0x0,
> start=0, length=-1)
>     at proto.c:1613
> #6  0x81d16ca in proto_tree_add_item (tree=0x847a514, hfindex=3937,
> tvb=0x0, start=0, length=-1,
>     little_endian=0) at proto.c:534
> #7  0x8144516 in dissect_mailslot_smb (mshdr_tvb=0x0, setup_tvb=0x0,
> tvb=0x84753d0, mailslot=0x0,
>     pinfo=0xa056da8, parent_tree=0x847a514) at packet-smb-mailslot.c:134
> #8  0x8141287 in dissect_transaction_response (tvb=0x8475368,
> pinfo=0xa056da8, tree=0xbbc55fc, offset=32,
>     smb_tree=0xbbc5598) at packet-smb.c:11595


Thanks. Apparently the comment before line 11595 in packet-smb.c is wrong.

                        case TRANSACTION_MAILSLOT:
                                /* This one should be safe to call
                                   even if s_tvb and sp_tvb is NULL
                                */
                                if(d_tvb){
                                        dissected_trans = dissect_mailslot_smb(
                                                sp_tvb, s_tvb, d_tvb, NULL, pinfo,
                                                top_tree);
                                }

--gilbert