Ethereal-dev: [ethereal-dev] Re: Multiple definition during compile
Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.
From: Guy Harris <gharris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 21:29:58 -0800
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2000 at 08:26:14PM -0200, Roberto Machado wrote: > > Hi! > > I wanted to try ethereal 0.8.0 today and faced problems to compile it > (only got there hacking the Makefile to remove support for the > gryphon plugin). > > System is BSDI 3.1. I'm using shlicc2, but gcc shows the same. > > Regards, > Roberto > > [...] > > extracting global C symbols from `plugins/gryphon/.libs/libgryphon.a' > (cd .libs && shlicc2 -c -fno-builtin "etherealS.c") > rm -f .libs/etherealS.c .libs/ethereal.nm .libs/ethereal.nmS .libs/ethereal.nmT > shlicc2 -Wall -g -O2 -I. -I./wiretap -I/usr/local/include > -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/local/lib/glib/include > -I/usr/local/include -o ethereal asn1.o capture.o colors.o column.o > conversation.o dfilter-grammar.o dfilter-scanner.o dfilter.o > ethertype.o file.o follow.o ipproto.o ipv4.o packet.o plugins.o > prefs.o print.o proto.o ps.o register.o resolv.o summary.o util.o > xdlc.o packet-aarp.o packet-afs.o packet-arp.o packet-ascend.o > packet-atalk.o packet-atm.o packet-auto_rp.o packet-bgp.o > packet-bootp.o packet-bootparams.o packet-bpdu.o packet-cdp.o > packet-clip.o packet-data.o packet-dns.o packet-eth.o packet-fddi.o > packet-ftp.o packet-giop.o packet-gre.o packet-hsrp.o packet-http.o > packet-icmpv6.o packet-icp.o packet-icq.o packet-imap.o packet-ip.o > packet-ipp.o packet-ipsec.o packet-ipv6.o packet-ipx.o packet-irc.o > packet-isakmp.o packet-isis.o packet-isis-clv.o packet-isis-hello.o > packet-isis-lsp.o packet-isis-snp.o packet-lapb.o packet-lapd.o > packet-ldap.o packet-llc.o packet-lpd.o packet-mapi.o packet-mount.o > packet-nbipx.o packet-nbns.o packet-ncp.o packet-netbios.o > packet-nfs.o packet-nlm.o packet-nntp.o packet-ntp.o packet-null.o > packet-osi.o packet-ospf.o packet-pim.o packet-pop.o packet-portmap.o > packet-ppp.o packet-pppoe.o packet-pptp.o packet-q2931.o packet-q931.o > packet-radius.o packet-raw.o packet-rip.o packet-ripng.o packet-rpc.o > packet-rsvp.o packet-rtsp.o packet-rx.o packet-sap.o packet-sdp.o > packet-smb.o packet-sna.o packet-snmp.o packet-srvloc.o packet-sscop.o > packet-stat.o packet-tacacs.o packet-tcp.o packet-telnet.o > packet-tftp.o packet-tns.o packet-tr.o packet-trmac.o packet-udp.o > packet-v120.o packet-vines.o packet-vlan.o packet-vrrp.o packet-wccp.o > packet-who.o packet-x25.o packet-yhoo.o packet-ypbind.o > packet-ypserv.o packet-ypxfr.o inet_pton.o wiretap/libwiretap.a > gtk/libui.a -lsnmp libltdl/.libs/libltdlc.a -ldl .libs/etherealS.o > plugins/gryphon/.libs/libgryphon.a -lz -lpcap -L/usr/local/lib > -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lgtk -lgdk -lgmodule -lglib -ldl > -lXext -lX11 -lm > proto.c:135: Definition of symbol _proto_init (multiply defined) > packet-gryphon.c:1519: Definition of symbol _proto_init (multiply > defined) > rm -f .libs/etherealS.o Uh-oh. It appears as if libtool may have concluded that BSD/OS 3.1 doesn't support run-time linking (I remember Donn Seeley saying, a while ago, that they were going to do their own shared library mechanism, rather than going with a SunOS 4.x/SVR4-style mechanism as the free-software BSDs and Linux did, and it may either be that it didn't exist in 3.1 or didn't support run-time linking in 3.1), and therefore, in order to support picking up the plugin, it tried statically linking it into the image. Does anybody know if there's a way to have a config file check whether, on the platform on which you're running it, you'll get real run-time linking from libtool? If so, then 1) we may want to use that, rather than the presence of <dlfcn.h>, to decide whether to enable plugins (doing so might make plugins work on HP-UX, which I suspect may not have <dlfcn.h> as they have their own non-"dlopen()" API for run-time linking, and the same may apply to Win32); 2) we should also use that to decide what to do about the Gryphon plugin, and perhaps we should leave it out if we don't get real run-time linking on that platform.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ethereal-dev] Re: Multiple definition during compile
- From: Craig Rodrigues
- Re: [ethereal-dev] Re: Multiple definition during compile
- Prev by Date: [ethereal-dev] Help needed understanding inet_pton.c
- Next by Date: Re: [ethereal-dev] Re: [ethereal-users] can not get it run under Redhat 6.1
- Previous by thread: [ethereal-dev] Help needed understanding inet_pton.c
- Next by thread: Re: [ethereal-dev] Re: Multiple definition during compile
- Index(es):