Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] 2 questions
From: "Maynard, Chris" <Christopher.Maynard@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 17:31:15 +0000
My apologies for this reply. I just now noticed that Guy had previously responded. Unfortunately, his response never made it to my inbox, but I do now see it at "The Mail Archive" here: https://www.mail-archive.com/wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg05179.html The Wireshark Mailing Lists page at https://www.wireshark.org/lists/ lists 3 archives: 1) Local archives (https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/): This archive contains nothing about this thread. 2) MARC archives (https://marc.info/?l=wireshark-users): As far as I can tell, this archive contains no wireshark-users messages since March/April 2022. 3) The Mail Archive (https://www.mail-archive.com/wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/): This is the only archive that appears to contain all messages. So perhaps I'm not receiving all messages for the same or for a similar reason as why the 1st 2 archives are not archiving them? - Chris > -----Original Message----- > From: Wireshark-users <wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> On > Behalf Of Maynard, Chris via Wireshark-users > Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 12:21 PM > To: 'Community support list for Wireshark' <wireshark- > users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Maynard, Chris <Christopher.Maynard@xxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] 2 questions > > CAUTION: This email originated outside of IGT. Do not click links or open > attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is > safe. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Wireshark-users <wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> On > > Behalf Of Jean-Michel Collard > > Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2023 9:37 PM > > To: wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [Wireshark-users] 2 questions > > > > First of all : Happy New Year to everyone 🙂 > And a happy belated new year to you! > > > Why Wireshark display IPv1/v6 addresses instead of hostnames (if any)? > That's probably because host name resolution is disabled in your > preferences. (And of course I assume you mean IPv4/v6.) > > > Can it be configured to have this ? > Yes. The primary preference to enable is "Edit -> Preferences -> Name > Resolution -> Resolve network (IP) addresses", but there are other name > resolution preferences just under that one that you may or may not also > want to enable. You can also cause IP addresses to be resolved by > manually adding entries in your hosts file located in your "Personal > configuration" folder or in one of the Profiles within that folder if you're > using a particular Profile. You can find your "Personal configuration" > folder from "Help -> About Wireshark -> Folders". For more information > about Name Resolution or Profiles, you can refer to the relevant sections > of the Wireshark User Guide that discusses these topics in more detail. > > Name Resolution: > https://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsug_html_chunked/ChAdvNameResoluti > onSection.html > Profiles: > https://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsug_html_chunked/ChCustConfigProfile > sSection.html > > > When one right click on a packet there is no whois ? > Correct. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is the property of International Game Technology PLC and/or its subsidiaries and may contain proprietary, confidential or trade secret information. This message is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this message in error, please delete this message from your system. Any unauthorized reading, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.
- References:
- Re: [Wireshark-users] 2 questions
- From: Maynard, Chris
- Re: [Wireshark-users] 2 questions
- Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] 2 questions
- Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] 2 questions
- Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] 2 questions
- Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] 2 questions
- Index(es):