Wireshark-users: [Wireshark-users] no dissecting on SCTP retransmissions or "retransmissions"

From: Ariel Burbaickij <ariel.burbaickij@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 10:58:11 +0100
Hello list,
I am aware of the similar exchange on TCP side which ended with following comment from Guy Harris on 01.09.2016:
"...

This has nothing to do with Lua; it has to do with the way the TCP dissector handles retransmissions.

If it's a retransmission, the original packet should have been dissected, so there should be no need to dissect the retransmission.

If it's not a retransmission, that's presumably an indication that TCP is mistakenly identifying it as a retransmission...."

The same behaviour of not decoding retransmission is observable in SCTP too. However, sometimes it is not genuine retransmission but double-tapping/double-forwarding from transparent taps, i.e. no changes at Ethernet/IP level and it would be good to see retransmitted or "retransmitted" packet decoded.

Are there any plans to make it configurable whether packets marked as retransmitted are dissected or not ?

Kind Regards

Ariel Burbaickij