Thank you Gerald. I will post now.
On 4/13/20 3:40 AM, Gerald Combs wrote:
Askbot (the software that runs ask.wireshark.org) has a banned word list as part of its moderation feature. The word "spa" was in the list, which was matching the word "Spanish" in your message. I removed the offending entry, so you should be able to post now.
On 4/10/20 9:50 AM, sll wrote:
Hey, it was my fault, it was just a stupid thing of mine!
My computer was in Spanish and average number 1.004 actually meant one
thousand and four!!
You know this bad thing of writing numbers differently depending on the
language you are in...
I'm trying to say this at ask.wireshark.org, but I always get "Internal
Server Error" when sending my message...
Cheers
sll:
Ah, ok. I'll ask there. Thank you Chuck!
On 9/4/20 14:55, chuck c wrote:
You'll probably get more eyeballs looking at it on the Q&A site:
https://ask.wireshark.org/questions/
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 7:32 AM sll <sll@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:sll@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hi everyone, I'm new to the list.
I am measuring data rates using Wireshark 3.2.2 and I believe some of
the data-rate units at "Statitstics" are non-consistent with my
tests. I
am not 100% sure, I might be missing something, so I would like
someone
else to have a look.
My believe is that the columns named "Bits/s" at tables
Statistics -> Conversations
Statistics -> Protocol Hierarchy
do not measure Bits/s but a different data-rate unit, actually I
believe
they measure kilobit per second.
I believe
Statistics -> I/O Graph
gives the correct data-rate.
Values at I/O Graph are around 1000 times higher than those at
Conversations and Protocol Hierarchy.
Can anyone have a look and let me know if I am right?
If I am, where can I ask to fix it? I am not a developer but I'd be
happy to open an issue or whatever is needed.
Please let me know if you think this question should go to a
different
Wireshark list and I will subscribe to it to ask my question.
Cheers!
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list
<wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe:
https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe