[Hugo van der Kooij <hugo.van.der.kooij@xxxxxxxxx>]

This message contains a digitally signed email which can be read by opening the attachment.

Hugo van der Kooij 
network engineer 

QSight IT 

T : +31 15 888 0 345

F : +31 15 888 0 445
E : hugo.van.der.kooij@xxxxxxxxx
I : http://www.qsight.nl

Arnhem - Delft - Veldhoven

--- Begin Message ---

From: Hugo van der Kooij <hugo.van.der.kooij@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 08:55:44 +0000

If you only measure 1 endpoint there is no way to tell where the packets are lost.

That is why doing measurement on 1 point only is …. insufficient for real troubleshooting.

Unfiltered traffic on both nodes may show some extra ICMP traffic warning you of issues somewhere on your path.

(MTU path discovery for example)

 

Met vriendelijke groet / With kind regards,

Hugo

 

Van: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Namens samira afzal
Verzonden: Tuesday, 7 February, 2017 06:35
Aan: wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Onderwerp: [Wireshark-users] wireshark analysis for packet loss

 

down votefavorite

HI Everyone, I have a network like bellow. I captured pcap over node1 interface. I was checking pcap's statistics. My question is that when i get "tcp.analysis.lost_segment" , Does it mean these packets are lost through node0 to node1 (path1 +path2) or these lost packets happened over path2?         path1                                path2               .................Router...............          .                                           .        .                                               . node 0                                                  node1 I sent this question in http://stackoverflow.com/questions/42060182/wireshark-analysis-for-packet-loss but i have not received any  reply there. I hope your guide. Thanks in advance

 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

--- End Message ---