Thanks, Guy!
________________________________________
Dave Stephenson
Ruckus Wireless
+1.408.604.8549
On 3/3/15, 9:57 PM, "Guy Harris" <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>On Mar 3, 2015, at 5:49 PM, Dave Stephenson <daves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>wrote:
>
>> I posted the email below to the winpcap-users list mid-Feburary and
>>have not received any response. Am wondering if winpcap¹s PPI
>>specification
>
>It's not WinPcap's specification; it happens to have been developed by
>the people at CACE Technologies, which was founded by some of the people
>who developed WinPcap, but there's nothing WinPcap-specific about it.
>
>> has been take over by Wireshark community?
>
>It hasn't.
>
>Personally, I look forward to radiotap:
>
> http://www.radiotap.org/
>
>being capable of providing all the 802.11 metadata that PPI can (if it
>can't already do so), and to having the time to add full pcap-ng support
>to libpcap and tcpdump so that there's no need to use PPI in order to
>encapsulate multiple types of network traffic in a single file or to
>represent any 802.11 metadata, and thus to PPI no longer having any
>capabilities that aren't offered by radiotap+pcap-ng or, for captures
>that don't need multiple link-layer types, offered by radiotap, so that
>nobody needs to use PPI.
>
>If you're trying to provide metadata in 802.11 captures, you might want
>to pursue adding the capability to radiotap, instead. Radiotap's being
>developed a bit more actively than PPI, and has a bit more of an open
>development process (an open mailing list and a website), although the
>last message I received on the list was from last November.
>__________________________________________________________________________
>_
>Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
>Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
>
>mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe