Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] TCP Delta question
The delta column is going to display the time from the last frame or the last in the same session or that is currently displayed (depending how you have it
set). Seeing a large delta isn’t an issue in its self, if it’s a keep alive and you are looking at it from a session level, it makes sense. If you have a busy box and are looking at delta from last frame you may never see a large delta because the box is busy
but if you move to delta conversation you may find you have a problem hidden but the other traffic.
Based on what you have posted I’m not sure you have an issue and I don’t think it advocates a tap in and of its self. Hope that helps From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Tom Simpson I am looking at a trace file from a server and have a question. I am seeing a large TCP Delta in some of the packets and the source server is the machine I have Wireshark installed on. Here is one of the packets that shows the large Delta. I took a trace from the server on the other end and it shows a very small, what I expected it to be, Delta
Time. Does this mean the server I am capturing on is possibly having an application issue of some sort? This was taken during a file transfer between the two; I copied Acrobat Reader from the fileserver to the terminal server. The transfer took a normal amount
of time, so I am thinking this is some housekeeping process for M$AD. No. Time
TCP Delta Source Destination Protocol Length Win Size Calc'd Win Size 41983 1408627378.013279 119.951789000
fileserver.mydomain.local
terminalserver.mydomain.local
TCP
55 64629 64629 [TCP Keep-Alive] microsoft-ds > 63239 [ACK] Seq=385 Ack=321 Win=64629 Len=1 This was a 1 byte keep alive which is what has me puzzled. I do see these same Delta times with similar traffic on some of our other servers on the network. Does
this mean there is an issue in AD, or is this just one more reason to use a TAP for a packet capture instead of installing wireshark locally on the server? -- Thanks, Tom Simpson LAN/WAN Engineer Forcht Group of Kentucky 859.259.9700 x538 "We all knew there was just one way to improve our odds for survival: train, train, train. Sometimes, if your training is properly intense it will kill you. More often -- much, much more often -- it will save your life." - Richard Marcinko, former US Navy SEAL Team Commander
|
- References:
- [Wireshark-users] TCP Delta question
- From: Tom Simpson
- [Wireshark-users] TCP Delta question
- Prev by Date: [Wireshark-users] TCP Delta question
- Next by Date: [Wireshark-users] USB Capture Explanation: Difference Interface vs. Port vs. Endpoint
- Previous by thread: [Wireshark-users] TCP Delta question
- Next by thread: [Wireshark-users] USB Capture Explanation: Difference Interface vs. Port vs. Endpoint
- Index(es):